Keywords
flipped classroom
Learning
sistematic review
teaching
How to Cite
Abstract
Instructional Design is a planned and systematized practice mediated by information and communication technologies. Its objective is to develop teaching-learning processes based on educational models and methods. Instructional Design has been used mainly in Virtual/Distance Education. Therefore, there is not enough empirical literature that demonstrates the impact that Instructional Design has on the Flipped Classroom. A systematic review was carried out to identify the state of knowledge about the impact of Instructional Design in the teaching-learning processes in the Flipped Classroom. The results suggest that: 1) The main objective of the application of Instructional Design in Flipped Classroom was to apply/evaluate an Educational Technology, where Instructional Design was only part of the method, but not one of the objectives; 2) There are no Instructional Design for Flipped Classroom that demonstrate its usefulness in learning processes. As a conclusion, it can be said that the Instructional Designs used in the Flipped Classroom are to apply/evaluate an Educational Technology and not to develop or/and evaluate the teaching-learning processes. In addition to the fact that proposals for Instructional Designs for Inverted Classroom that adapt to their characteristics are needed.
References
Álvares-Martínez, E., Murillo, M., & Ramírez, A. (2016). Modelos de diseño instruccional mediados por tecnología en la capacitación empresarial. Revista Electrónica de Divulgación de la Investigación, 11, 1–17. https://www.uv.mx/personal/albramirez/files/2014/02/alvarez_d_instruccional.pdf
Barral, A., Ardi-Pastores, V., & Simmons, R. (2018). Student Learning in an Accelerated Introductory Biology Course Is Significantly Enhanced by a Flipped-Learning Environment. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0129
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
Díaz-Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2010). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista (3a ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Escudero-Nahón, A., & González, D. (2017). Propuesta para identificar la investigación de frontera en la Investigación Basada en Diseño sobre nuevos modelos educativos. Posibles retos del Diseño ante grandes cambios, 932–944.
Escudero-Nahón, A., & Mercado-López, P. (2019). Use of learning analytics in the flipped classroom: a systematic review. Apertura, 11(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v11n2.1546
Escudero-Nahón, A., & Segura, C. (2017). E-learning en la sociedad del conocimiento: Modelo pedagógico virtual de la Universidad Iberoamericana León, Guanajuato, México. En V. Kowalski (Ed.), Memorias del Séptimo Congreso Virtual Iberaoamericano de Calidad en Educación Virtual y a Distancia (pp. 370–380). Editorial Virtual Argentina. http://debate2017.eduqa.net/file.php/1/Memorias_2017/Memoria_2017_tomo_2_de_5.pdf
Fernández, A. R., Merino, P. J. M., & Kloos, C. D. (2018). Scenarios for the application of learning analytics and the flipped classroom. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2018-April, 1619–1628. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363429
González, P., & Trevino, J. (2019). Learning-oriented assessment in action: impact on students of physics for engineering. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(4), 1485–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00606-2
Jahnke, I., & Liebscher, J. (2020). Three types of integrated course designs for using mobile technologies to support creativity in higher education. Computers & Education, 146, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103782
Madrid, G., Angulo, A., Prieto, M., Fernández, N., & Olivares, C. (2018). Implementación de aula invertida en un curso propedéutico de habilidad matemática en bachillerato. Apertura, 10, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.18381/Ap.v10n1.1149
Matzumura-Kasano, J., Gutiérrez-Crespo, H., Zamudio-Eslava, L., & Zavala-Gonzales, J. . (2018). Flipped Learning Model to Achieve Learning Goals in the Research Methodology Course in Undergraduate Students. Revista Electrónica Educare, 22(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.22-3.9
Melo, L., & Sánchez, R. (2017). Análisis de las percepciones de los alumnos sobre la metodología aula invertida para la enseñanza de técnicas avanzadas en laboratorios de análisis de residuos de medicamentos veterinarios y contaminantes. Educación Química, 28(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2016.09.010
Muñoz, M., & Vidal, M. (2018). Proyecto Aula invertida para el desarrollo de aprendizaje significativo en la educación postgradual en Salud. Convención Internacional de Salud.
Ortiz, D. (2015). El constructivismo como teoría y método de enseñanza. Shphia Colección de Filosofía de la Educación, 93, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n19.2015.04
Patiño, A., & Martínez, A. (2019). Tensiones en el diseño instruccional de cursos en línea en instituciones de educación superior. EDUTEC, 62, 102–120.
Plano, V. L. (2019). Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: Identifying why, what, when, and how. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2019.01.007
Rojas, P. (2017). Learning Analytics. Una Revisión de la Literatura. Educación y Educadores, 20(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2017.20.1.6
Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K. K., & Krampen, G. (2016). A longitudinal study on information-seeking knowledge in psychology undergraduates: Exploring the role of information literacy instruction and working memory capacity. Computers & Education, 96, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.011
Salazar, A. (2018). Evaluación de aprendizaje significativo y estílos de aprendizaje: alcances, propuestas y desafíos en el aula. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 31, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2018.31.001
Sánchez-Meca, J., & Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 3(1), 7–17.
Schunk, D. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje (6a ed.). Pearson. https://ciec.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Teorias-del-Aprendizaje-Dale-Schunk.pdf
Simon, M., Placa, N., Kara, M., & Avitzur, A. (2018). Empirically-based hypothetical learning trajectories for fraction concepts: Products of the Learning Through Activity research program. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.003
Vives-Varela, T., Durán-Cárdenas, C., Varela-Ruíz, M., & Fortoul van der Goes, T. (2014). La autorregulación en el aprendizaje, la luz de un faro en el mar. Investigación en Educación Médica, 3(9), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(14)72723-1
Webel, C., Sheffel, C., & Conner, K. (2018). Flipping instruction in a fifth grade class: A case of an elementary mathematics specialist. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Emma Patricia Mercado-López, Alexandro Escudero-Nahón